From: "John F. Barber, Ph.D." 
    To: tednellen 
    Subject: Re: getting ready for Baltimore
    
    Ted,
    
    I have looked at and read through your NCTE website.  Here are some first
    reactions:
    
    What you have presented here is quite clearly the voice of the "other."  
    These are voices that are and will be silenced by the popular rhetoric of
    political and patriotic patois currently bandied about by elected officials
    and news media in this country.  The voice of the other, however, as you show
    quite dramatically through this website, is every bit as real and connected
    to a sense of self as we argue our own response to be.
    
    The problem is that you present a voice of the other that is currently
    demonized.  Teachers and others will respond negatively to your presentation
    simply because it presents the voice of the other they have been told to
    consider "evil."  Political duplicity and religious narrow-mindedness will
    override the obvious strength of your work: that it provides ways to discuss
    teaching and learning from the voice of the other, especially through
    expository writing.
    
    And here, I think, is the power of what you are working on: the opportunity
    to create clear channels of self-expression and communication through
    dialogue between people of differing voices.  Such an approach has been
    embraced by writing theorists, researchers, and teachers for years.  Your
    audience should be able to transcend their initial shock over the subject of
    your work to listen carefully to the voices it frames.
    
    They may, however, encounter other problems.  First, it is unclear whether
    this website is meant to stand on its own or simply provide substance for
    your presentation.  If it is meant to stand alone I think more information is
    required.  If it is meant to support your presentation, then there is
    probably too much information.
    
    If this website is meant to stand alone, then I think it needs, and deserves,
    some context, an overview, and an executive summary.  What is this all about?  
    Why was it produced?  How did you happen to get involved?  What is the
    significance of this project?  What are we supposed to learn from this?  
    What, and how, can we, as teachers, draw from this website and use in our own
    teaching?
    
    Answers to such questions are unclear, or unaswered.  Obviously I can think
    about what I read in your website and conclude that different people have
    different opinions about what happened on 9/11/01.  But how do I align this
    with my own thinking?  And what does it mean to me as I am trying to teach
    writing.
    
    The thoughts and feelings of the student writings you share in this website
    point to a seemingly great "teachable moment."  Did this teacher talk with
    the students about their writing?  Were there any dialogues with other
    students in other countries?  What resulted from any such dialogue?
    
    Maybe you are going to cover such questions about background and application
    in your NCTE presentation.  If so, then is this website designed to support
    your presentation?  If that is the case, then would this website be more
    effective in some condensed form?  Perhaps it would be better to provide
    excerpts of what the students wrote with links to the full text for those
    interested?  If this is background and support for your presentation, would
    it be better presented in bulleted or telegraphed formats?  You provide a
    great deal of information here, so much that I wonder whether you will be
    able to cover it effectively, much less allow your audience to grasp it
    completely, in the short time allotted to your presentation.
    
    In either case, what are we, as the audience of your presentation supposed to
    do, to think, to feel after listening to your presentation and seeing this
    website?  What is the purpose?  The emotional energy in this website is
    powerful and raw and compelling but personal and cultural bias will determine
    how one responds to such information.  All the more reason to have a clearly
    stated purpose for such a communication.
    
    I think you have connected with something here and the work you have done in
    this initial presentation is fabulous.  I am sure the effectiveness of your
    work will sharpen as you work more and more closely with focus.
    
    Best,
    John